Never Say Sith Lord
(Continued from
previous page)
As if he didn't have enough critics on
Wall Street, Byrne has cultivated another large encampment of
antagonists, in the media. He, his company, and his cause have been
the focus of dozens of articles, in recent months mostly negative,
in the business and financial media. The SEC's recent, withheld
subpoenas of three journalists, in connection with their
communications with analysts, must have been a source of
vindication, if not outright delight, to Byrne. Three days after the
subpoenas were delivered, Byrne reportedly sent a taunting email to
Herb Greenberg of Marketwatch.com, which started this way:
"I am just sitting here with a glass of wine in my hands, reflecting
on what a really bad week you and your friends have had."
The email excerpt appeared in a Joe Nocera column titled
"Overstock's Campaign of Menace," appearing in The New York Times.
Nocera went on to thoroughly bash Byrne as an enemy of the free
press, and to defend Greenberg as "one of the straightest shooters I
know."
Patrick Byrne himself makes for great copy, and a colorful character
study. No typical tech entrepreneur, he holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy,
from Stanford. He has overcome cancer, he says, and bicycled across
the country four times. A child of privilege, he grew up in home
where Warren Buffett was an occasional houseguest, when his dad
headed up Geico. Even Byrne's detractors concede his stellar
intelligence. His acerbic written commentaries, posted frequently on
the Internet, are peppered with Latin references and Nietzsche
quotes. Byrne is willing and able to match wits with most
hard-bitten reporters, who, he says, often operate with cynical,
hidden agendas. He is both an attack dog and a lightning rod,
revered and reviled in the disparate factions of the
securities/business/media complex. Many people think he is nuts.
In a quarterly earnings conference call last summer, he said the
manipulation of Overstock's share prices was led by "one of the
master criminals of the 1980s." Some speculated that he meant
Michael Miliken, the junk bond king who was convicted in 1990 of
fraud in the bond market, and did 22 months in prison. Byrne has
refused to identify the alleged mastermind by name, saying the
identity may come out as the legal proceedings unfold. But he
likened the alleged manipulator to a "Sith Lord" character in Star
Wars.
The Sith Lord reference has brought Byrne enormous ridicule, by
reporters who portray it not as a quaint quote, but as evidence of
delusion. One of his most persistent critics is Jeff Matthews, a
hedge fund manager who publishes a stock market blog called "Jeff Matthews Is
Not Making This Up." On
August 12, 2005, Byrne and Matthews squared off in a contentious
joint interview on CNBC. One stock market writer later called their
confrontation "the greatest 15 minutes of television I've seen in
the past year." It was fascinating, I agree, because it well
illustrated the enmity that divides Byrne from the Wall Street
establishment. You can view it yourself at
this site.
The CNBC interview had Byrne reading aloud from a sworn affidavit
that, he says, came from someone who participated in conversations
about a plan to manipulate Overstock stock, through skewed analysis
and biased articles in the media. "They were coordinating the timing
of their reports to please Rocker," he reads, referring to Rocker
Partners, the short-selling hedge fund that Byrne and Overstock have
sued.
Personally, I found Byrne's allegations to be precise to a fault.
But Matthews repeatedly characterizes the assertions as "incoherent"
and "incomprehensibly bizarre," referring also to statements made by
Byrne in a conference call a few days earlier. Matthews accuses
Byrne of pursuing "a vast conspiracy." He makes the most of Byrne's
Sith Lord comment, assuring the program's host that he is "not
making this up."
Matthews is pressed to explain what he considers bizarre. "What can
you say?" he pleads, looking pained and seeking support from the
host. "I think Patrick's comments say it all," he insists. Twice, he
goes off in slow-moving harangues, straining to land a blow while he
seems to ponder exactly what to say. ("We're all big boys"…"We're
all just trying to make money.") Twice, he says, "It doesn't work
this way," implying that Byrne is somehow breaking the rules.
There is nothing new or bizarre, Byrne counters, about allegations
of cheating in the securities markets. Trading scams in the 1980s
landed Drexel Burnham Lambert traders (including Miliken) in prison,
he notes. Stock market manipulations by Jesse Livermore, in the
1930s and 1940s, are chronicled in a thinly disguised biography
titled "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator." Matthews acknowledges
the Livermore book, but oddly calls it "the bible of the business."
Byrne defends his Sith Lord remark as what it was: a metaphor about
manipulation, and "a very easy reference any thirteen-year-old could
understand." Again he declines to identify the short-selling
mastermind, saying the names may come out in court. Byrne asks
Matthews, "Can you remember any manipulation where someone might
later be called the Sith Lord of manipulation?"
Matthews hesitates. "What you label a guy…"
In frustration, Byrne says, "There's not a single viewer to whom
what I just said is incoherent." Then speaking directly to viewers,
he adds, "If you agree what I just said is coherent, then you know
this guy is an empty suit."
I had to agree. Matthews came off as an empty suit.
(Continued) Fighting Back
Return to Page 1 |
|
News and Comment
|
|
This piece of experimental journalism
focuses on a controversial activity in the U.S. stock market. "Naked"
short selling involves selling non-existent "counterfeit" shares, often
with the intent of driving down the price of a stock. All the
information was gathered on the web and in other media, with no original
reporting on my part. Presented throughout are my own opinions,
insights, and interpretations of fact, blended with facts in a way that
wouldn’t fit into a more conventional format. |
|
|
|